svētdiena, 2007. gada 28. oktobris
Ability to stand people
sestdiena, 2007. gada 27. oktobris
Does Brand flexibility go beyond the brand?
Zizou’s head-butt became an inspiration to Internet gamers, musicians and comedians. More creative Zhao Xiaokai, general manager of a sport-related company in China, paid around 200 dollars to register a trade mark (for clothing, shoes, hats and beer products) representing two shadows that look precisely like the two footballers when Zidane head-butted. Due to intellectual property rights if anybody wants to use the image again, it will cost 100.000 dollars.
Is it parasite-brand age?
Zidane brand itself is worldwide known as a result recognition level of this trademark is very high. Therefore soccer star's image rights are not violated because it’s just a silhouette. Evidence for Mike Tyson’s famous bite Evander Holyfield's ear still is very expensive chocolate ear souvenirs. I wonder, why I havn’t heard about trademark reflecting Justin Timberlake’s behaviour during the Superbowl halftime performance when he popped off part of Jackson's corset, exposing her breast. Zizou’s and Tyson’s case brings food for fought – it seems in commercialised world gaps can be found everywhere! As world is rocked by several big companie’s names and to find new marketplace becomes harder and harder, as Zhao Xiaokai has understood – it’s more profitable and more easy to be a parasite on existing substructure than create new one. As Mika sings: relax, take it easy!
Catch 22 with property rights
Easy way going arises a question of property rights. „It is possible that Zidane and Materazzi will argue that Zhao has no rights to trade mark the head-butt image, even as a silhouette, given that they arguably are still recognisable” was said in Out-Law website (on the one hand the commercial value of personal endorsements by third parties should be limited by law. Property rights are protected by licences and patents, but it’s impossible to predict what on earth can every „zhaos xiaokais” come up with. But on the other hand in property rights law should be included more restrictions to avoid such absurd cases as the US Olympic Committee brand protecting activities. "Years ago the US Olympic Committee hit back against anyone who dared to use the word 'Olympics' to describe some sort of competition, In the UK, the use of the word 'Olympic' could be barred under copyright law and therefore perhaps even the digits '2012.'"